Tracking issue: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/201242 Migration guide docs: https://llvm.org/docs/SphinxQuickstartTemplate.html#markdown-migration-guidelines RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-make-myst-markdown-the-llvm-docs-format-rip-rest/90840 This was prepared with rst2myst plus LLM-assisted cleanup. I paged through all the generated HTML looking for migration artifacts, and all of the differences I could find appear to be formatting error corrections. I noticed that there is a large block of literal rst text in APINotes.md, but I will defer that for later cleanup.
3 KiB
Adoption Guide for -fbounds-safety
:local: true
Where to get -fbounds-safety
The open sourcing to llvm.org's llvm-project is still on going and the
feature is not available yet. In the mean time, the preview implementation is
available
here in a
fork of llvm-project. Please follow
Building LLVM with CMake to build the
compiler.
Feature flag
Pass -fbounds-safety as a Clang compilation flag for the C file that you
want to adopt. We recommend adopting the model file by file, because adoption
requires some effort to add bounds annotations and fix compiler diagnostics.
Include ptrcheck.h
ptrcheck.h is a Clang toolchain header to provide definition of the bounds
annotations such as __counted_by, __counted_by_or_null, __sized_by,
etc. In the LLVM source tree, the header is located in
llvm-project/clang/lib/Headers/ptrcheck.h.
Add bounds annotations on pointers as necessary
Annotate pointers on struct fields and function parameters if they are pointing
to an array of object, with appropriate bounds annotations. Please see
{doc}BoundsSafety to learn what kind of bounds annotations are available and
their semantics. Note that local pointer variables typically don't need bounds
annotations because they are implicitly a wide pointer (__bidi_indexable)
that automatically carries the bounds information.
Address compiler diagnostics
Once you pass -fbounds-safety to compile a C file, you will see some new
compiler warnings and errors, which guide adoption of -fbounds-safety.
Consider the following example:
#include <ptrcheck.h>
void init_buf(int *p, int n) {
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i)
p[i] = 0; // error: array subscript on single pointer 'p' must use a constant index of 0 to be in bounds
}
The parameter int *p doesn't have a bounds annotation, so the compiler will
complain about the code indexing into it (p[i]) as it assumes that p is
pointing to a single int object or null. To address the diagnostics, you
should add a bounds annotation on int *p so that the compiler can reason
about the safety of the array subscript. In the following example, p is now
int *__counted_by(n), so the compiler will allow the array subscript with
additional run-time checks as necessary.
#include <ptrcheck.h>
void init_buf(int *__counted_by(n) p, int n) {
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i)
p[i] = 0; // ok; `p` is now has a type with bounds annotation.
}
Run test suites to fix new run-time traps
Adopting -fbounds-safety may cause your program to trap if it violates
bounds safety or it has incorrect adoption. Thus, it is necessary to perform
run-time testing of your program to gain confidence that it won't trap at
run time.
Repeat the process for each remaining file
Once you've done with adopting a single C file, please repeat the same process for each remaining C file that you want to adopt.