While it's true that the root item can't be a special, the first item to
be added is not necessarily the root item. In particular, it isn't when
refreshing.
Probably fixes#194
That *usually* doesn't take longer than a few milliseconds, but it can
take a few seconds for some extremely large dirs, on very slow computers
or with optimizations disabled. Better display a message than make it
seem as if ncdu has stopped doing anything.
And also adjust the graph width calculation to do a better job when the
largest item is smaller than the number of columns used for the graph,
which would previously draw either nothing (if size = 0) or a full bar
(if size > 0).
Fixes#172.
I'm tagging this as a "stable" 2.0 release because the 2.0-beta#
numbering will get confusing when I'm working on new features and fixes.
It's still only usable for people who can use the particular Zig version
that's required (0.9.0 currently) and it will certainly break on
different Zig versions. But once you have a working binary for a
supported arch, it's perfectly stable.
The --enable-* options also work for imported files, this fixes#120.
Most other options are not super useful on its own, but these will be
useful when there's a config file.
As aluded to in the previous commit. This approach keeps track of hard
links information much the same way as ncdu 1.16, with the main
difference being that the actual /counting/ of hard link sizes is
deferred until the scan is complete, thus allowing the use of a more
efficient algorithm and amortizing the counting costs.
As an additional benefit, the links listing in the information window
now doesn't need a full scan through the in-memory tree anymore.
A few memory usage benchmarks:
1.16 2.0-beta1 this commit
root: 429 162 164
backup: 3969 1686 1601
many links: 155 194 106
many links2*: 155 602 106
(I'm surprised my backup dir had enough hard links for this to be an
improvement)
(* this is the same as the "many links" benchmarks, but with a few
parent directories added to increase the tree depth. 2.0-beta1 doesn't
like that at all)
Performance-wise, refresh and delete operations can still be improved a
bit.
While this simplifies the code a bit, it's a regression in the sense
that it increases memory use.
This commit is yak shaving for another hard link counting approach I'd
like to try out, which should be a *LOT* less memory hungry compared to
the current approach. Even though it does, indeed, add an extra cost of
these parent node pointers.
It's a bit ugly, but appears to work. I've not tested the 32bit arm
version, but the others run.
The static binaries are about twice as large as the ncdu 1.x
counterparts.
I had planned to checkout out async functions here so I could avoid
recursing onto the stack alltogether, but it's still unclear to me how
to safely call into libc from async functions so let's wait for all that
to get fleshed out a bit more.
