Commit graph

15 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Yorhel
40b127591f Import/export extended information
And stick to the more portable second resolution timestamps for mtime.
2018-01-23 14:11:42 +01:00
Yorhel
77aca35fce Add support for optional "extended" information for each file/dir entry
Unfortunately, there wasn't a single bit free in struct dir.flags, so I
had to increase its size to 16 bit. This commit is just the initial
preparation, there's still a few things to do:

- Add "extended information" cli flag to enable/disable this
  functionality.
- Export and import extended information when requested
- Do something with the data.

I also did a few memory measurements on a file list with 12769842 items:

  before this commit:    1.239 GiB
  without extended info: 1.318 GiB
  with extended info:    1.698 GiB

It's surprising what adding a single byte to a struct can do to the
memory usage. :(
2018-01-23 13:17:06 +01:00
Yorhel
e4f211db68 Year + version bump for 1.12 2016-08-24 20:59:58 +02:00
piyo
bfff5762e0 Confirm quit action during scan (reuse existing scan dialog). 2015-09-23 15:44:32 +09:00
Yorhel
efece12cfe Copyright year update 2014-01-22 15:28:20 +01:00
Yorhel
fe932c7b22 Add support for browsing empty directories
Turns out that being able to open an empty directory actually has its
uses:
- If you delete the last file in a directory, you now won't be directed
  to the parent directory anymore. This allows keeping 'd' pressed
  without worrying that you'll delete stuff outside of the current dir.
  (This is the primary motivation for doing this)
- You can now scan and later refresh an empty directory, as suggested by
  #2 in http://dev.yorhel.nl/ncdu/bug/15
2014-01-22 13:30:51 +01:00
Yorhel
bc8ccc959d dir_scan.c: Reset directory sizes when excluded by a CACHEDIR.TAG
Tiny bug fix: The size of an excluded directory entry itself should not
be counted, either. This is consistent with what you'd expect: A cache
directory with thousands of files can easily take up several megabytes
for the dir entry - but from the perspective of a backup system that
recognizes cache dirs - the dir is empty, and therefore shouldn't take
any extra space at all.
2013-04-12 19:43:29 +02:00
Petr Pudlak
3def47c331 Add CACHEDIR.TAG support.
A new command line parameter allows to filter out directories containing
the proper `CACHEDIR.TAG` file.
See http://www.brynosaurus.com/cachedir/
2013-04-10 16:50:57 +02:00
Yorhel
10dca5503a Added -f option to import an exported directory structure
This is the first working version. There's a few TODO's left.
2012-09-05 13:52:12 +02:00
Yorhel
c4616ff186 Added simple error checking & handling when exporting 2012-08-29 10:27:12 +02:00
Yorhel
21c056f51d Use uint64_t instead of dev_t as well + added comment explaining this 2012-08-27 21:10:07 +02:00
Yorhel
cabb55290d Use uint64_t instead of ino_t
POSIX defines ino_t to be of an unsigned integer type, and searching
around the net didn't tell me of any definitions conflicting that. So
every ino_t can be represented in an uint64_t. (Assuming that is the
largest integer type in use for an inode number, but I'm sure that
assumption will hold for a while)

(dev_t, on the other hand, is a bit messier. Still figuring out what to
do with that.)
2012-08-27 19:12:13 +02:00
Yorhel
e380805990 Fixed some compiler warnings and a (rather nonexistent) memory leak
This silences clang and gcc with -O2 -Wall -Wextra
2012-08-26 18:12:13 +02:00
Yorhel
5064b4d651 Re-added scanning UI and improved error handling 2012-08-26 17:08:10 +02:00
Yorhel
0fd7dec7b0 Split calc.c into separate components (dir_(mem|scan|common).c)
The architecture is explained in dir.h. The reasons for these changes is
two-fold:
- calc.c was too complex, it simply did too many things. 399ccdeb is a
  nice example of that: Should have been an easy fix, but it introduced
  a segfault (fixed in 0b49021a), and added a small memory leak.
- This architecture features a pluggable input/output system, which
  should make a file export/import feature relatively simple.

The current commit does not feature any user interface, so there's no
feedback yet when scanning a directory. I'll get to that in a bit.

I've also not tested the new scanning code very well yet, so I might
have introduced some bugs.
2012-08-26 15:29:55 +02:00