Fix code that attempted to produce a diagnostic with one DiagnosticEngine, then
produce a note for that diagnostic either with a different DiagnosticEngine or after calling DiagnosticEngine::Reset(). That didn't make any sense, and did the wrong thing if the original diagnostic was suppressed. llvm-svn: 170636
This commit is contained in:
parent
4419449391
commit
5bb4cdfaa9
10 changed files with 52 additions and 13 deletions
|
|
@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ namespace clang {
|
|||
|
||||
/// \brief Whether to perform a minimal import.
|
||||
bool Minimal;
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Whether the last diagnostic came from the "from" context.
|
||||
bool LastDiagFromFrom;
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Mapping from the already-imported types in the "from" context
|
||||
/// to the corresponding types in the "to" context.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -607,6 +607,12 @@ public:
|
|||
ArgToStringCookie = Cookie;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Note that the prior diagnostic was emitted by some other
|
||||
/// \c DiagnosticsEngine, and we may be attaching a note to that diagnostic.
|
||||
void notePriorDiagnosticFrom(const DiagnosticsEngine &Other) {
|
||||
LastDiagLevel = Other.LastDiagLevel;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Reset the state of the diagnostic object to its initial
|
||||
/// configuration.
|
||||
void Reset();
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -135,7 +135,8 @@ def err_odr_function_type_inconsistent : Error<
|
|||
"external function %0 declared with incompatible types in different "
|
||||
"translation units (%1 vs. %2)">;
|
||||
def warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent : Warning<
|
||||
"type %0 has incompatible definitions in different translation units">;
|
||||
"type %0 has incompatible definitions in different translation units">,
|
||||
InGroup<DiagGroup<"odr">>;
|
||||
def note_odr_tag_kind_here: Note<
|
||||
"%0 is a %select{struct|interface|union|class|enum}1 here">;
|
||||
def note_odr_field : Note<"field %0 has type %1 here">;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -206,12 +206,16 @@ namespace {
|
|||
/// \brief Whether to complain about failures.
|
||||
bool Complain;
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief \c true if the last diagnostic came from C2.
|
||||
bool LastDiagFromC2;
|
||||
|
||||
StructuralEquivalenceContext(ASTContext &C1, ASTContext &C2,
|
||||
llvm::DenseSet<std::pair<Decl *, Decl *> > &NonEquivalentDecls,
|
||||
bool StrictTypeSpelling = false,
|
||||
bool Complain = true)
|
||||
: C1(C1), C2(C2), NonEquivalentDecls(NonEquivalentDecls),
|
||||
StrictTypeSpelling(StrictTypeSpelling), Complain(Complain) { }
|
||||
StrictTypeSpelling(StrictTypeSpelling), Complain(Complain),
|
||||
LastDiagFromC2(false) {}
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Determine whether the two declarations are structurally
|
||||
/// equivalent.
|
||||
|
|
@ -229,11 +233,17 @@ namespace {
|
|||
public:
|
||||
DiagnosticBuilder Diag1(SourceLocation Loc, unsigned DiagID) {
|
||||
assert(Complain && "Not allowed to complain");
|
||||
if (LastDiagFromC2)
|
||||
C1.getDiagnostics().notePriorDiagnosticFrom(C2.getDiagnostics());
|
||||
LastDiagFromC2 = false;
|
||||
return C1.getDiagnostics().Report(Loc, DiagID);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
DiagnosticBuilder Diag2(SourceLocation Loc, unsigned DiagID) {
|
||||
assert(Complain && "Not allowed to complain");
|
||||
if (!LastDiagFromC2)
|
||||
C2.getDiagnostics().notePriorDiagnosticFrom(C1.getDiagnostics());
|
||||
LastDiagFromC2 = true;
|
||||
return C2.getDiagnostics().Report(Loc, DiagID);
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
|
@ -4319,7 +4329,7 @@ ASTImporter::ASTImporter(ASTContext &ToContext, FileManager &ToFileManager,
|
|||
bool MinimalImport)
|
||||
: ToContext(ToContext), FromContext(FromContext),
|
||||
ToFileManager(ToFileManager), FromFileManager(FromFileManager),
|
||||
Minimal(MinimalImport)
|
||||
Minimal(MinimalImport), LastDiagFromFrom(false)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ImportedDecls[FromContext.getTranslationUnitDecl()]
|
||||
= ToContext.getTranslationUnitDecl();
|
||||
|
|
@ -4822,10 +4832,18 @@ DeclarationName ASTImporter::HandleNameConflict(DeclarationName Name,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
DiagnosticBuilder ASTImporter::ToDiag(SourceLocation Loc, unsigned DiagID) {
|
||||
if (LastDiagFromFrom)
|
||||
ToContext.getDiagnostics().notePriorDiagnosticFrom(
|
||||
FromContext.getDiagnostics());
|
||||
LastDiagFromFrom = false;
|
||||
return ToContext.getDiagnostics().Report(Loc, DiagID);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
DiagnosticBuilder ASTImporter::FromDiag(SourceLocation Loc, unsigned DiagID) {
|
||||
if (!LastDiagFromFrom)
|
||||
FromContext.getDiagnostics().notePriorDiagnosticFrom(
|
||||
ToContext.getDiagnostics());
|
||||
LastDiagFromFrom = true;
|
||||
return FromContext.getDiagnostics().Report(Loc, DiagID);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -108,11 +108,7 @@ void DiagnosticsEngine::Reset() {
|
|||
TrapNumUnrecoverableErrorsOccurred = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
CurDiagID = ~0U;
|
||||
// Set LastDiagLevel to an "unset" state. If we set it to 'Ignored', notes
|
||||
// using a DiagnosticsEngine associated to a translation unit that follow
|
||||
// diagnostics from a DiagnosticsEngine associated to anoter t.u. will not be
|
||||
// displayed.
|
||||
LastDiagLevel = (DiagnosticIDs::Level)-1;
|
||||
LastDiagLevel = DiagnosticIDs::Ignored;
|
||||
DelayedDiagID = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
// Clear state related to #pragma diagnostic.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -366,9 +366,12 @@ void Driver::generateCompilationDiagnostics(Compilation &C,
|
|||
C.PrintDiagnosticJob(OS, C.getJobs());
|
||||
OS.flush();
|
||||
|
||||
// Clear stale state and suppress tool output.
|
||||
// Keep track of whether we produce any errors while trying to produce
|
||||
// preprocessed sources.
|
||||
DiagnosticErrorTrap Trap(Diags);
|
||||
|
||||
// Suppress tool output.
|
||||
C.initCompilationForDiagnostics();
|
||||
Diags.Reset();
|
||||
|
||||
// Construct the list of inputs.
|
||||
InputList Inputs;
|
||||
|
|
@ -430,7 +433,7 @@ void Driver::generateCompilationDiagnostics(Compilation &C,
|
|||
BuildJobs(C);
|
||||
|
||||
// If there were errors building the compilation, quit now.
|
||||
if (Diags.hasErrorOccurred()) {
|
||||
if (Trap.hasErrorOccurred()) {
|
||||
Diag(clang::diag::note_drv_command_failed_diag_msg)
|
||||
<< "Error generating preprocessed source(s).";
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -13,3 +13,7 @@ struct C {
|
|||
C &operator=(C&);
|
||||
~C();
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
enum E {
|
||||
b = 1
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,3 +7,7 @@ struct B : A {
|
|||
int foo();
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
enum E {
|
||||
a = 0,
|
||||
b = 1
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,9 +1,14 @@
|
|||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-pch -o %t.1.ast %S/Inputs/class1.cpp
|
||||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-pch -o %t.2.ast %S/Inputs/class2.cpp
|
||||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -ast-merge %t.1.ast -ast-merge %t.2.ast -fsyntax-only %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
|
||||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -ast-merge %t.1.ast -ast-merge %t.2.ast -fsyntax-only %s 2>&1 -Wno-odr | count 0
|
||||
|
||||
// CHECK: class1.cpp:5:8: warning: type 'B' has incompatible definitions in different translation units
|
||||
// CHECK: class1.cpp:6:9: note: field 'y' has type 'float' here
|
||||
// CHECK: class2.cpp:6:7: note: field 'y' has type 'int' here
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME: we should also complain about mismatched types on the method
|
||||
|
||||
// CHECK: class1.cpp:17:6: warning: type 'E' has incompatible definitions in different translation units
|
||||
// CHECK: class1.cpp:18:3: note: enumerator 'b' with value 1 here
|
||||
// CHECK: class2.cpp:11:3: note: enumerator 'a' with value 0 here
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ This test serves two purposes:
|
|||
|
||||
The list of warnings below should NEVER grow. It should gradually shrink to 0.
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK: Warnings without flags (148):
|
||||
CHECK: Warnings without flags (147):
|
||||
CHECK-NEXT: ext_delete_void_ptr_operand
|
||||
CHECK-NEXT: ext_enum_friend
|
||||
CHECK-NEXT: ext_expected_semi_decl_list
|
||||
|
|
@ -106,7 +106,6 @@ CHECK-NEXT: warn_not_compound_assign
|
|||
CHECK-NEXT: warn_objc_property_copy_missing_on_block
|
||||
CHECK-NEXT: warn_objc_protocol_qualifier_missing_id
|
||||
CHECK-NEXT: warn_octal_escape_too_large
|
||||
CHECK-NEXT: warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent
|
||||
CHECK-NEXT: warn_on_superclass_use
|
||||
CHECK-NEXT: warn_param_default_argument_redefinition
|
||||
CHECK-NEXT: warn_partial_specs_not_deducible
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue